Podcast 184: Ruling out pulmonary embolism in primary care

September 22nd, 2015

Podcast 184: Ruling out pulmonary embolism in primary care

Subscribe: RSS

Pulmonary embolism is a vexing problem in primary care: Does this patient have it? Can I send them home with reassurance? Should I refer them for further testing?

A Dutch group has evaluated the tests most likely to be available in the primary care setting — the various flavors of the Wells rules and the Geneva scores — against a panel of some 600 patients with suspected PE and known outcomes after referral and three months’ follow-up. They come down in favor of the Wells rule and simple D-dimer testing, but an editorialist in the BMJ offers a note of dissent.

Our interview with one of the study authors, Dr. Geert-Jan Geersing, sorts this all out.

[Running time: 13 minutes]

BMJ study (free)

BMJ editorial (subscription required)

Categories: Diagnosis, Geneva score, Pulmonary embolism, Wells rule
Tags: D-dimer test, Geert-Jan Geersing, Geneva score, Pulmonary embolism, Wells rule

Clinical Conversations

This podcast features lively interviews, concise summaries, and expert commentary that busy clinicians need to stay current and improve patient care.

September 22nd, 2015